How assessments can take you from
training to proof

Assessment proof is built on four foundations

A “training complete” checkbox shows people finished a course, but regulators are increasingly looking for proof that people can actually do the job. Assessments can help you provide that proof but they need to be built on four key foundations:

Build assessments around the role

Make assessments role-specific
Start with what the job involves. A job task analysis maps the knowledge, skills, abilities and conditions a role depends on. You survey the people who do the work, set their answers against what the regulatory experts say, and design the most valid test you can.
Control how questions are written and approved
Subject matter experts draft questions, instructional designers edit them or send them back, and only a supervisor or quality assurance role can publish. Item statuses keep unfinished questions off live tests, and every step is kept as an audit history you can show auditors.
Keep assessments organized to roles and individuals
Group questions by topic, then tag them by jurisdiction so you can tell which content applies where. A set of anti-money laundering questions, for example, can apply to Florida but not New York.

Protect test integrity

Limit cheating and answer-sharing
Random ordering of questions and answer choices adds a layer of security, and randomly parallel forms mean two people can sit different tests that cover the same topics. Test takers also consent to a code of conduct before they start, so the rules are clear up front.
Control the testing environment
Locked-down browsers prevent printing, screen capture and switching to other tasks during the exam. Choose the proctoring that fits the risk of the role: live online, onsite or test center, or record and review, which flags suspicious behavior for review.
Check the results after the exam
Psychometric reports and forensic analysis help you spot patterns that point to cheating, such as an unusually high score in a very short time, or answers that are too similar between candidates. These checks flag what’s worth looking into but they don't necessarily mean cheating has taken plance.

Keep evidence of what you tested

Record how each test was built and delivered
Item history and assessment revisions are tracked by default. Every result is tagged with the assessment and question revisions it used, so you can say exactly which version of a test produced it.
Show what each person was tested on
The coaching report shows the questions a person saw, how they answered and what they scored. Generate them one at a time or in bulk for a whole cohort.
Keep the data and the on-the-job evidence
Data is kept indefinitely by default, with an optional retention policy to delete older data. Observational assessment captures evidence from the job itself, through a rating scale, a checklist or uploaded files.

Coaching report

Assess when risk changes

Test the right people at the right time
New hires and contractors need assessing too, and regular compliance tests may need ad hoc runs. Questionmark connects to your HCM or HRIS and learning management system, supports single sign-on, and has an API to automate delivery.
Keep content current when regulations change
A searchable item bank helps you find what needs updating. Questions that are no longer valid can be retired in bulk by changing their status from normal to retired.

From completion to compliance

The rules still apply. States are increasingly stepping in as federal agencies ease up. Who enforces and what they prioritize has moved. This is a shift in priorities, not a free pass.
Regulators look for evidence. They want proof that people were trained on the real risks and understood them, and that you can show why decisions were made.
Assessments can supply that evidence. Valid and reliable assessments support it from training and outcomes through to audit trails.

Enforcement is shifting, but the core obligations haven’t gone away, which is why how you approach training and evidence needs to hold up to regulatory scrutiny.

We’re Questionmark, and we support L&D and certification programs just like yours with enterprise solutions that support the entire assessment lifecycle. Powered by Learnosity's gold-standard assessment engine, we've helped 750+ customers across multiple industries to leverage modern assessment solutions for better learning and business outcomes.

Discover assessment solutions for FSI and open the doors to all the future-facing tools and tech needed to make high-stakes and skill-based learning a success.

Learn more.

We have a lot of different assessment takers across a variety of different regions, locations, and roles. Questionmark provides a hard to replicate capability in being able to break down our assessment reporting into a level of granularity that we need.

Learning Technologist, Financial Services Firm